“Church discipline” is a challenging topic. Most of the (Protestant) churches I’ve attended throughout my life have adhered to the idea that it’s the duty of believers—and the church communities they form—to confront serious sin within the community. Church discipline is derived from passages like Matthew 18 and Titus 1, which encourage Christians to lovingly but earnestly challenge sin, always with the goal of encouraging repentance and restoration.
In my experience, most churches don’t talk too much about this duty, presumably because they don’t want to sound too authoritarian; and perhaps because it’s easy for such discussions to take on a gossip-y tone.
My introduction to the practice of church discipline came when a member of my church congregation publicly confessed to a sexual sin that had affected part of the church community. The church elders, made aware of the sin and its impact on the church, talked to the responsible person and helped him through a process of repentance and restoration. It was the sort of situation that might have resulted in a lot of nasty and lurid gossip; but it ended up being a positive experience of grace for the church (and for the individual who publicly repented).
Witnessing loving church discipline in action was a fascinating experience. It did, however make me wonder about a few things: What would have happened if the church had not confronted the person in such a compassionate manner? What if the individual had refused to repent or acknowledge his sin? Given that everyone in the church is a sinner, how do we decide which sins require confrontation?
Have you ever experienced church discipline, and if so, what was the result? What does godly church discipline look like in action?